Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Sizing up newspapers' watchdog reporting

I posted a blog last week at the Center on Communication Leadership and Policy that got a fair amount of notice -- mainly courtesy of Mr. Romenesko. He gave it the headline: Newspaper investigative reporting can be easily replaced? Don't believe it! I'd just finished judging McClatchy's in-house newspaper contest, and was struck by how deep and wide is the watchdog reporting that continues in newspapers. Which in turn prompted me to write that a very big void would be created if newspapers couldn't do this anymore.

I'm not a newspaper supremacist. I think there's a very decent chance that watchdog reporting will have a new and, quite possibly, richer life on the Web. But I also think new-media experts are underestimating how much watchdog reporting exists now in newspapers. It's not just I-team, five-part investigation stuff. And it's not just happening at the New York Times.

1 comment:

La Claudia said...

As if responding to your blog, I found this story by Gary Kamiya at Salon's. So true, most of the original reporting, investigative or not, is still done by newspapers. TV stations and radio only regurgitate what the papers reported on first.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2009/02/17/newspapers/